Hi folks, Why are ks_pcie_fault() and imx6q_pcie_abort_handler() different? I think they're doing the same thing, and the "instr & 0x0e100090" part is the same, but only imx6 has the "instr & 0x0c100000" part. And the return values are different in some cases. Could/should these be shared somehow? They're both under #ifdef CONFIG_ARM, so maybe it could be provided by arch/arm? static int ks_pcie_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs) { unsigned long instr = *(unsigned long *) instruction_pointer(regs); if ((instr & 0x0e100090) == 0x00100090) { int reg = (instr >> 12) & 15; regs->uregs[reg] = -1; regs->ARM_pc += 4; } return 0; } static int imx6q_pcie_abort_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs) { unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs); unsigned long instr = *(unsigned long *)pc; int reg = (instr >> 12) & 15; /* * If the instruction being executed was a read, * make it look like it read all-ones. */ if ((instr & 0x0c100000) == 0x04100000) { unsigned long val; if (instr & 0x00400000) val = 255; else val = -1; regs->uregs[reg] = val; regs->ARM_pc += 4; return 0; } if ((instr & 0x0e100090) == 0x00100090) { regs->uregs[reg] = -1; regs->ARM_pc += 4; return 0; } return 1; }