On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:27 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 08:15:05PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Since the printing of the inbound resources was added, alignment and > > indentation of the host bridge window table is broken because of two > > reasons: > > 1. The "IB MEM" row header is longer than the other headers, > > 2. Inbound ranges typically extend beyond 32-bit address space, and thus > > don't fit in "#010llx". > > > > Fix this by extending the row header field to 6 characters, and the > > format string to 40-bit addresses. > > > > Use "%6s" to handle field size and right-alignment, instead of manual > > preparation using error-prone snprintf() calls. Use the exact same > > format string for both cases, to allow sharing. > > > > Impact on kernel boot log on r8a7791/koelsch: > > > > rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie@fe000000 ranges: > > -rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: IO 0xfe100000..0xfe1fffff -> 0x00000000 > > -rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: MEM 0xfe200000..0xfe3fffff -> 0xfe200000 > > -rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: MEM 0x30000000..0x37ffffff -> 0x30000000 > > -rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: MEM 0x38000000..0x3fffffff -> 0x38000000 > > -rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: IB MEM 0x40000000..0xbfffffff -> 0x40000000 > > -rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: IB MEM 0x200000000..0x2ffffffff -> 0x200000000 > > +rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: IO 0x00fe100000..0x00fe1fffff -> 0x0000000000 > > +rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: MEM 0x00fe200000..0x00fe3fffff -> 0x00fe200000 > > +rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: MEM 0x0030000000..0x0037ffffff -> 0x0030000000 > > +rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: MEM 0x0038000000..0x003fffffff -> 0x0038000000 > > +rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: IB MEM 0x0040000000..0x00bfffffff -> 0x0040000000 > > +rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: IB MEM 0x0200000000..0x02ffffffff -> 0x0200000000 > > > > Fixes: 52ac576f88f9f701 ("PCI: of: Add inbound resource parsing to helpers") > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pci/of.c | 14 +++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > Hi Rob, > > do you mind if I squash this patch in the Fixes: above ? No, LGTM. Rob