On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:18:16AM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 07:37:26AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:02:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > No functional changes implied. > > > > [snip] > > > > > - while (true) { > > > + do { > > > pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &slot_status); > > > if (slot_status == (u16) ~0) { > > > ctrl_info(ctrl, "%s: no response from device\n", > > > @@ -81,11 +81,9 @@ static int pcie_poll_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, int timeout) > > > PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC); > > > return 1; > > > } > > > - if (timeout < 0) > > > - break; > > > msleep(10); > > > timeout -= 10; > > > - } > > > + } while (timeout > 0); > > > return 0; /* timeout */ > > > } > > > > If you really want to ensure no funcitonal change, I think the end of > > the loop needs to be 'while (timeout >= 0);' > > With this suggested change, you can add: > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx> > > I can't get too excited by coding styles, however I find this more > readable now, due to the fact that the loop is clearly bounded. Thank you, Keith and Andrew, I'll submit v2 soon. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko