On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 05:13:50PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > On 10/26/2019 7:29 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > On 10/25/2019 7:58 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > > On 10/21/2019 11:13 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > > > > > Hi Sinan / Rafael, > > > Apologies for the ping again. > > > Do you guys have any further comments on this? > > > > > > -Vidya Sagar > > > > I think you'll need some attention from Bjorn here to see the complete > > picture. > > > > As I said, changing pci_device_is_present() is not right. This needs to > > be done at one level higher. > > Hi Bjorn, > Could you please help me understand why this change can't be done in > pci_device_is_present() API? I assume that's because pci_device_is_present() is currently called in contexts that aren't allowed to sleep, therefore you would trigger a regression. Lorenzo
