On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:45:43 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:30:11 +0200, > Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Oct 18, 2019, at 16:18, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:38:47 +0200, > > > Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > >> > > >> A driver may want to know the existence of _PR3, to choose different > > >> runtime suspend behavior. A user will be add in next patch. > > >> > > >> This is mostly the same as nouveau_pr3_present(). > > >> > > >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > It's confusing -- this particular change isn't reported by the test > > > bot, but only about the lack of the CONFIG_ACPI ifdef. > > > > Hmm, because the test bot asked to add the tag. > > Yes, but it's only if you add a new fix patch on top of it. > You can write some their credit, too, but basically it'd be enough to > point to the Link tag to the thread. > > > If it's not appropriate will you drop it? I can also send a v7. > > I can modify in my side. Now I merged both patches to for-next branch. thanks, Takashi
