On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:46 AM Daniel Drake <drake@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 5:22 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > While I still think that both the system resume and runtime resume code paths > > should be as similar as reasonably possible, the above needs to be taken into > > account IMO, so it is better to retain pci_pm_default_resume_early(), but make > > it do a conditional "ACPI power state refresh" and then call > > pci_restore_standard_config(). > > > > So something like the patch below (can you please test it too?). > > This is also working fine, thanks for your help! Thanks for the confirmation and let me submit the patch properly.
