On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:15:24PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 07.10.19 um 11:32 schrieb Mika Westerberg: > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 09:34:41AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > >> Am 04.10.19 um 15:06 schrieb Mika Westerberg: > >>> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:57:21PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > >>>> Am 04.10.19 um 14:39 schrieb Mika Westerberg: > >>>>> @Matthias, @Paul and @Nicholas, I appreciate if you could check that this > >>>>> does not cause any issues for your systems. > >>>> Just to be sure: is this intended to be applied against the 5.4-rc* > >>>> master branch? > >>> Yes, it applies on top of v5.4-rc1. > >> I am sorry to say that I cannot currently test - my computer has a > >> GeForce 1060-6GB an no onboard/on-chip graphics. > >> The nvidia module 435.21 does not compile against 5.4-rc* for me (5.3.1 > >> was fine). > > I think the two patches should apply cleanly on 5.3.x as well. > > Mika, that worked. > > With your two patches on top of Linux 5.3.4, two Suspend-to-RAM cycles > (ACPI S3), one Suspend-to-disk cycle (ACPI S4), > no regressions observed => success? Yes, if it did not hang during resume (because of the PME loop) I think it should be declared as success :) Thanks a lot for testing!
