On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 06:36:12PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:30 PM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 06:05:14PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > > > still happens with your patch applied. The machine simply gets shut down. > > > > > > dmesg can be found here: > > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/karolherbst/40eb091c7b7b33ef993525de660f1a3b/raw/2380e31f566e93e5ba7c87ef545420965d4c492c/gistfile1.txt > > > > Looking your dmesg: > > > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DCB version 4.1 > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: MM: using COPY for buffer copies > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: [drm] Initialized nouveau 1.3.1 20120801 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 1 > > > > I would assume it runtime suspends here. Then it wakes up because of PCI > > access from userspace: > > > > Sep 30 17:24:42 kernel: pci_raw_set_power_state: 56 callbacks suppressed > > > > and for some reason it does not get resumed properly. There are also few > > warnings from ACPI that might be relevant: > > > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) > > Sep 30 17:24:27 kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20190509/nsarguments-59) > > afaik this is the case for essentially every laptop out there. I think we should look into this a little bit. acpi_ns_check_argument_types() checks the argument type and prints this message, but AFAICT it doesn't actually fix anything or prevent execution of the method, so I have no idea what happens when we actually execute the _DSM. If we execute this _DSM as part of power management, and the _DSM doesn't work right, it would be no surprise that we have problems. Maybe we could learn something by turning on ACPI_DB_PARSE output (see Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst). You must have an acpidump already from all your investigation. Can you put it somewhere, e.g., bugzilla.kernel.org, and include a URL?
