Hi Andrew Murray, On 9/11/2019 6:30 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:46:17PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:Hi Andrew Murray, Please find my response inline. On 9/9/2019 4:31 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:51:03PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:On 9/6/2019 7:20 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 06:58:11PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:Hi Andrew Murray, Thanks for the review. Please find my response inline. On 9/5/2019 6:45 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 06:10:31PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:Add support to PCIe RC controller on Intel Universal Gateway SoC. PCIe controller is based of Synopsys Designware pci core. Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---Hi Dilip, Thanks for the patch, initial feedback below:changes on v3: Rename PCIe app logic registers with PCIE_APP prefix. PCIE_IOP_CTRL configuration is not required. Remove respective code. Remove wrapper functions for clk enable/disable APIs. Use platform_get_resource_byname() instead of devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to be similar with DWC framework. Rename phy name to "pciephy". Modify debug message in msi_init() callback to be more specific. Remove map_irq() callback. Enable the INTx interrupts at the time of PCIe initialization. Reduce memory fragmentation by using variable "struct dw_pcie pci" instead of allocating memory. Reduce the delay to 100us during enpoint initialization intel_pcie_ep_rst_init(). Call dw_pcie_host_deinit() during remove() instead of directly calling PCIe core APIs. Rename "intel,rst-interval" to "reset-assert-ms". Remove unused APP logic Interrupt bit macro definitions. Use dwc framework's dw_pcie_setup_rc() for PCIe host specific configuration instead of redefining the same functionality in the driver. Move the whole DT parsing specific code to intel_pcie_get_resources() drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-axi.c | 840 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 854 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-axi.c diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig index 6ea778ae4877..e44b9b6a6390 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig @@ -82,6 +82,19 @@ config PCIE_DW_PLAT_EP order to enable device-specific features PCI_DW_PLAT_EP must be selected. +config PCIE_INTEL_AXI + bool "Intel AHB/AXI PCIe host controller support" + depends on PCI_MSI + depends on PCII don't think the PCI dependency is required here. I'm also not sure why PCI_MSI is required, we select PCIE_DW_HOST which depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN which depends on PCI_MSI.Agree, dependency on PCI and PCI_MSI can be removed. I will remove it in next patch revision.+ depends on OF + select PCIE_DW_HOST + help + Say 'Y' here to enable support for Intel AHB/AXI PCIe Host + controller driver. + The Intel PCIe controller is based on the Synopsys Designware + pcie core and therefore uses the Designware core functions to + implement the driver.I can see this description is similar to others in the same Kconfig, however I'm not sure what value a user gains by knowing implementation details - it's helpful to know that PCIE_INTEL_AXI is based on the Designware core, but is it helpful to know that the Designware core functions are used?+ config PCI_EXYNOS bool "Samsung Exynos PCIe controller" depends on SOC_EXYNOS5440 || COMPILE_TEST diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile index b085dfd4fab7..46e656ebdf90 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW) += pcie-designware.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST) += pcie-designware-host.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_EP) += pcie-designware-ep.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_PLAT) += pcie-designware-plat.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_AXI) += pcie-intel-axi.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DRA7XX) += pci-dra7xx.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_EXYNOS) += pci-exynos.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_IMX6) += pci-imx6.o diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-axi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-axi.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..75607ce03ebf --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-axi.c @@ -0,0 +1,840 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * PCIe host controller driver for Intel AXI PCIe Bridge + * + * Copyright (c) 2019 Intel Corporation. + */ + +#include <linux/bitfield.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> +#include <linux/of_irq.h> +#include <linux/of_pci.h> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> + +#include "../../pci.h"Please remove this - it isn't needed.Ok, will remove it in next patch revision.+#include "pcie-designware.h" + +#define PCIE_CCRID 0x8 + +#define PCIE_LCAP 0x7C +#define PCIE_LCAP_MAX_LINK_SPEED GENMASK(3, 0) +#define PCIE_LCAP_MAX_LENGTH_WIDTH GENMASK(9, 4)These look like the standard PCI Link Capabilities Register, can you use the standard ones defined in pci_regs.h? (see PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_*).+ +/* Link Control and Status Register */ +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS 0x80 +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS_ASPM_ENABLE GENMASK(1, 0) +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS_RCB128 BIT(3) +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS_LINK_DISABLE BIT(4) +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS_COM_CLK_CFG BIT(6) +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS_HW_AW_DIS BIT(9) +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS_LINK_SPEED GENMASK(19, 16) +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS_NEGOTIATED_LINK_WIDTH GENMASK(25, 20) +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS_SLOT_CLK_CFG BIT(28)These look like the standard Link Control and Link Status register, can you use the standard ones defined in pci_regs.h? (see PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_* and PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_*).+ +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS2 0xA0 +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED GENMASK(3, 0) +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED_25GT 0x1 +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED_5GT 0x2 +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED_8GT 0x3 +#define PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED_16GT 0x4And these look like the standard Link Control Register 2 (see PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_*). Most of the #defines above and below look just like standard PCI defines (for example those found in pci_regs.h) - both in terms of their name and what they do. Ideally where the functionality is the same or very similar, then we should use the standard PCI defines in (pci_regs.h). This helps readability/understanding, helps to identify duplicate code and reduces the size of your patch. Also the capability offsets (e.g. PCIE_LCTLSTS2) are also standard. The offsets you define are offset by an additional 0x70. E.g.i PCIE_LCTLSTS2 = 0xA0, and PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2 = 0x30. Perhaps abstracting this offset will allow you to use the standard pci defines? I haven't looked in much detail at the remainder of the defines, but the same rationale should apply.Agree, that's a good point. I will define the offset macro and use the macros defined in pci_regs.h.+#define PCIE_LCTLSTS2_HW_AUTO_DIS BIT(5) + +/* Ack Frequency Register */ +#define PCIE_AFR 0x70C +#define PCIE_AFR_FTS_NUM GENMASK(15, 8) +#define PCIE_AFR_COM_FTS_NUM GENMASK(23, 16) +#define PCIE_AFR_GEN12_FTS_NUM_DFT (SZ_128 - 1) +#define PCIE_AFR_GEN3_FTS_NUM_DFT 180 +#define PCIE_AFR_GEN4_FTS_NUM_DFT 196 + +#define PCIE_PLCR_DLL_LINK_EN BIT(5) +#define PCIE_PORT_LOGIC_FTS GENMASK(7, 0) +#define PCIE_PORT_LOGIC_DFT_FTS_NUM (SZ_128 - 1) + +#define PCIE_MISC_CTRL 0x8BC +#define PCIE_MISC_CTRL_DBI_RO_WR_EN BIT(0) + +#define PCIE_MULTI_LANE_CTRL 0x8C0 +#define PCIE_UPCONFIG_SUPPORT BIT(7) +#define PCIE_DIRECT_LINK_WIDTH_CHANGE BIT(6) +#define PCIE_TARGET_LINK_WIDTH GENMASK(5, 0) + +/* APP RC Core Control Register */ +#define PCIE_APP_CCR 0x10 +#define PCIE_APP_CCR_LTSSM_ENABLE BIT(0) + +/* PCIe Message Control */ +#define PCIE_APP_MSG_CR 0x30 +#define PCIE_APP_MSG_XMT_PM_TURNOFF BIT(0) + +/* PCIe Power Management Control */ +#define PCIE_APP_PMC 0x44 +#define PCIE_APP_PMC_IN_L2 BIT(20) + +/* Interrupt Enable Register */ +#define PCIE_APP_IRNEN 0xF4 +#define PCIE_APP_IRNCR 0xF8 +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_AER_REPORT BIT(0) +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_PME BIT(2) +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_RX_VDM_MSG BIT(4) +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_PM_TO_ACK BIT(9) +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_LINK_AUTO_BW_STAT BIT(11) +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_BW_MGT BIT(12) +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_MSG_LTR BIT(18) +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_SYS_ERR_RC BIT(29) + +#define PCIE_APP_INTX_OFST 12 +#define PCIE_APP_IRN_INT (PCIE_APP_IRN_AER_REPORT | PCIE_APP_IRN_PME | \ + PCIE_APP_IRN_RX_VDM_MSG | PCIE_APP_IRN_SYS_ERR_RC | \ + PCIE_APP_IRN_PM_TO_ACK | PCIE_APP_IRN_MSG_LTR | \ + PCIE_APP_IRN_BW_MGT | PCIE_APP_IRN_LINK_AUTO_BW_STAT | \ + (PCIE_APP_INTX_OFST + PCI_INTERRUPT_INTA) | \ + (PCIE_APP_INTX_OFST + PCI_INTERRUPT_INTB) | \ + (PCIE_APP_INTX_OFST + PCI_INTERRUPT_INTC) | \ + (PCIE_APP_INTX_OFST + PCI_INTERRUPT_INTD)) + +#define BUS_IATU_OFFS SZ_256M +#define RST_INTRVL_DFT_MS 100 +enum { + PCIE_LINK_SPEED_AUTO = 0, + PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN1, + PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN2, + PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN3, + PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN4, +}; + +struct intel_pcie_soc { + unsigned int pcie_ver; + unsigned int pcie_atu_offset; + u32 num_viewport; +}; + +struct intel_pcie_port { + struct dw_pcie pci; + unsigned int id; /* Physical RC Index */ + void __iomem *app_base; + struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio; + u32 rst_interval; + u32 max_speed; + u32 link_gen; + u32 max_width; + u32 lanes; + struct clk *core_clk; + struct reset_control *core_rst; + struct phy *phy; +}; + +static void pcie_update_bits(void __iomem *base, u32 mask, u32 val, u32 ofs) +{ + u32 orig, tmp; + + orig = readl(base + ofs); + + tmp = (orig & ~mask) | (val & mask); + + if (tmp != orig) + writel(tmp, base + ofs); +} + +static inline u32 pcie_app_rd(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp, u32 ofs) +{ + return readl(lpp->app_base + ofs); +} + +static inline void pcie_app_wr(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp, u32 val, u32 ofs) +{ + writel(val, lpp->app_base + ofs); +} + +static void pcie_app_wr_mask(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp, + u32 mask, u32 val, u32 ofs) +{ + pcie_update_bits(lpp->app_base, mask, val, ofs); +} + +static inline u32 pcie_rc_cfg_rd(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp, u32 ofs) +{ + return dw_pcie_readl_dbi(&lpp->pci, ofs); +} + +static inline void pcie_rc_cfg_wr(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp, u32 val, u32 ofs) +{ + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(&lpp->pci, ofs, val); +} + +static void pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp, + u32 mask, u32 val, u32 ofs) +{ + pcie_update_bits(lpp->pci.dbi_base, mask, val, ofs); +} + +static void intel_pcie_mem_iatu(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + struct pcie_port *pp = &lpp->pci.pp; + phys_addr_t cpu_addr = pp->mem_base; + + dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(&lpp->pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, + PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, cpu_addr, + pp->mem_base, pp->mem_size); +} + +static void intel_pcie_ltssm_enable(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + pcie_app_wr_mask(lpp, PCIE_APP_CCR_LTSSM_ENABLE, + PCIE_APP_CCR_LTSSM_ENABLE, PCIE_APP_CCR); +} + +static void intel_pcie_ltssm_disable(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + pcie_app_wr_mask(lpp, PCIE_APP_CCR_LTSSM_ENABLE, 0, PCIE_APP_CCR); +} + +static const char *pcie_link_gen_to_str(int gen) +{ + switch (gen) { + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN1: + return "2.5"; + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN2: + return "5.0"; + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN3: + return "8.0"; + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN4: + return "16.0"; + default: + return "???"; + } +} + +static void intel_pcie_link_setup(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + u32 val; + + val = pcie_rc_cfg_rd(lpp, PCIE_LCAP); + lpp->max_speed = FIELD_GET(PCIE_LCAP_MAX_LINK_SPEED, val); + lpp->max_width = FIELD_GET(PCIE_LCAP_MAX_LENGTH_WIDTH, val); + + val = pcie_rc_cfg_rd(lpp, PCIE_LCTLSTS); + + val &= ~(PCIE_LCTLSTS_LINK_DISABLE | PCIE_LCTLSTS_ASPM_ENABLE); + val |= (PCIE_LCTLSTS_SLOT_CLK_CFG | PCIE_LCTLSTS_COM_CLK_CFG | + PCIE_LCTLSTS_RCB128); + pcie_rc_cfg_wr(lpp, val, PCIE_LCTLSTS); +} + +static void intel_pcie_max_speed_setup(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + u32 reg, val; + + reg = pcie_rc_cfg_rd(lpp, PCIE_LCTLSTS2); + switch (lpp->link_gen) { + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN1: + reg &= ~PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED; + reg |= PCIE_LCTLSTS2_HW_AUTO_DIS | + PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED_25GT; + break; + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN2: + reg &= ~PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED; + reg |= PCIE_LCTLSTS2_HW_AUTO_DIS | + PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED_5GT; + break; + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN3: + reg &= ~PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED; + reg |= PCIE_LCTLSTS2_HW_AUTO_DIS | + PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED_8GT; + break; + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN4: + reg &= ~PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED; + reg |= PCIE_LCTLSTS2_HW_AUTO_DIS | + PCIE_LCTLSTS2_TGT_LINK_SPEED_16GT; + break; + default: + /* Use hardware capability */ + val = pcie_rc_cfg_rd(lpp, PCIE_LCAP); + val = FIELD_GET(PCIE_LCAP_MAX_LINK_SPEED, val); + reg &= ~PCIE_LCTLSTS2_HW_AUTO_DIS; + reg |= val; + break; + } + pcie_rc_cfg_wr(lpp, reg, PCIE_LCTLSTS2); +} + +static void intel_pcie_speed_change_enable(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + u32 mask, val; + + mask = PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE | PCIE_PORT_LOGIC_FTS; + val = PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE | PCIE_PORT_LOGIC_DFT_FTS_NUM; + + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, mask, val, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL); +} + +static void intel_pcie_speed_change_disable(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE, 0, + PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL); +} + +static void intel_pcie_max_link_width_setup(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + u32 mask, val; + + /* HW auto bandwidth negotiation must be enabled */ + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, PCIE_LCTLSTS_HW_AW_DIS, 0, PCIE_LCTLSTS); + + mask = PCIE_DIRECT_LINK_WIDTH_CHANGE | PCIE_TARGET_LINK_WIDTH; + val = PCIE_DIRECT_LINK_WIDTH_CHANGE | lpp->lanes; + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, mask, val, PCIE_MULTI_LANE_CTRL);Is this identical functionality to the writing of PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL in dw_pcie_setup? I ask because if the user sets num-lanes in the DT, will it have the desired effect?intel_pcie_max_link_width_setup() function will be called by sysfs attribute pcie_width_store() to change on the fly.Indeed, but a user may also set num-lanes in the device tree. I'm wondering if, when set in device-tree, it will have the desired effect. Because I don't see anything similar to PCIE_LCTLSTS_HW_AW_DIS in dw_pcie_setup which is what your function does here. I guess I'm trying to avoid the suitation where num-lanes doesn't have the desired effect and the only way to set the num-lanes is throught the sysfs control.I will check this and get back to you.intel_pcie_max_link_width_setup() is doing the lane resizing which is different from the link up/establishment happening during probe. Also PCIE_LCTLSTS_HW_AW_DIS default value is 0 so not setting during the probe or dw_pcie_setup. intel_pcie_max_link_width_setup() is programming as per the designware PCIe controller databook instructions for lane resizing. Below lines are from Designware PCIe databook for lane resizing. Program the TARGET_LINK_WIDTH[5:0] field of the MULTI_LANE_CONTROL_OFF register. Program the DIRECT_LINK_WIDTH_CHANGE2 field of the MULTI_LANE_CONTROL_OFF register. It is assumed that the PCIE_CAP_HW_AUTO_WIDTH_DISABLE field in the LINK_CONTROL_LINK_STATUS_REG register is 0.OK, so there is a difference between initial training and then resizing of the link. Given that this is not Intel specific, should this function exist within the designware driver for the benefit of others?
I am ok to add if maintainer agrees with it.
+} + +static void intel_pcie_port_logic_setup(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + u32 val, mask, fts; + + switch (lpp->max_speed) { + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN1: + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN2: + fts = PCIE_AFR_GEN12_FTS_NUM_DFT; + break; + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN3: + fts = PCIE_AFR_GEN3_FTS_NUM_DFT; + break; + case PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN4: + fts = PCIE_AFR_GEN4_FTS_NUM_DFT; + break; + default: + fts = PCIE_AFR_GEN12_FTS_NUM_DFT; + break; + } + mask = PCIE_AFR_FTS_NUM | PCIE_AFR_COM_FTS_NUM; + val = FIELD_PREP(PCIE_AFR_FTS_NUM, fts) | + FIELD_PREP(PCIE_AFR_COM_FTS_NUM, fts); + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, mask, val, PCIE_AFR); + + /* Port Link Control Register */ + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, PCIE_PLCR_DLL_LINK_EN, + PCIE_PLCR_DLL_LINK_EN, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL); +} + +static void intel_pcie_upconfig_setup(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, PCIE_UPCONFIG_SUPPORT, + PCIE_UPCONFIG_SUPPORT, PCIE_MULTI_LANE_CTRL); +} + +static void intel_pcie_rc_setup(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + intel_pcie_ltssm_disable(lpp); + intel_pcie_link_setup(lpp); + dw_pcie_setup_rc(&lpp->pci.pp); + intel_pcie_upconfig_setup(lpp); + + intel_pcie_max_speed_setup(lpp); + intel_pcie_speed_change_enable(lpp); + intel_pcie_port_logic_setup(lpp); + intel_pcie_mem_iatu(lpp);Doesn't dw_pcie_setup_rc do the same as intel_pcie_mem_iatu?Thanks for pointing it. dw_pcie_setup_rc() does. intel_pcie_mem_iatu can be removed.Excellent.+} + +static int intel_pcie_ep_rst_init(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + struct device *dev = lpp->pci.dev; + int ret; + + lpp->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + if (IS_ERR(lpp->reset_gpio)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(lpp->reset_gpio); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "failed to request PCIe GPIO: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + /* Make initial reset last for 100us */ + usleep_range(100, 200); + + return 0; +} + +static void intel_pcie_core_rst_assert(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + reset_control_assert(lpp->core_rst); +} + +static void intel_pcie_core_rst_deassert(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + /* + * One micro-second delay to make sure the reset pulse + * wide enough so that core reset is clean. + */ + udelay(1); + reset_control_deassert(lpp->core_rst); + + /* + * Some SoC core reset also reset PHY, more delay needed + * to make sure the reset process is done. + */ + usleep_range(1000, 2000); +} + +static void intel_pcie_device_rst_assert(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lpp->reset_gpio, 1); +} + +static void intel_pcie_device_rst_deassert(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + msleep(lpp->rst_interval); + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lpp->reset_gpio, 0); +} + +static int intel_pcie_app_logic_setup(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + intel_pcie_device_rst_deassert(lpp); + intel_pcie_ltssm_enable(lpp); + + return dw_pcie_wait_for_link(&lpp->pci); +} + +static irqreturn_t intel_pcie_core_isr(int irq, void *arg) +{ + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp = arg; + u32 val, reg; + + reg = pcie_app_rd(lpp, PCIE_APP_IRNCR); + val = reg & PCIE_APP_IRN_INT; + + pcie_app_wr(lpp, val, PCIE_APP_IRNCR); + + trace_printk("PCIe misc interrupt status 0x%x\n", reg); + return IRQ_HANDLED; +}Why do we bother handling this interrupt?This helps during debugging.I think it should be removed. It adds very little value to most users. Most users won't have access to the datasheets to debug this properly, and in any case if they could, then they would be competent to add an interrupt handler themselves.IMO, having this will help to get the basic hardware interrupt status during debugging. And, user also can enhance the handler as per the need. I thing keeping it is beneficial than removing it. Please let me know your view.I'm much prefer to remove this.Sure, i am OK to remove it.+ +static int intel_pcie_setup_irq(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + struct device *dev = lpp->pci.dev; + struct platform_device *pdev; + char *irq_name; + int irq, ret; + + pdev = to_platform_device(dev); + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + if (irq < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "missing sys integrated irq resource\n"); + return irq; + } + + irq_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "pcie_misc%d", lpp->id); + if (!irq_name) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to alloc irq name\n"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, intel_pcie_core_isr, + IRQF_SHARED, irq_name, lpp); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "request irq %d failed\n", irq); + return ret; + } + /* Enable integrated interrupts */ + pcie_app_wr_mask(lpp, PCIE_APP_IRN_INT, + PCIE_APP_IRN_INT, PCIE_APP_IRNEN); + + return ret; +} + +static void intel_pcie_core_irq_disable(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + pcie_app_wr(lpp, 0, PCIE_APP_IRNEN); + pcie_app_wr(lpp, PCIE_APP_IRN_INT, PCIE_APP_IRNCR); +} + +static int intel_pcie_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp; + struct resource *res; + struct dw_pcie *pci; + struct device *dev; + int ret; + + lpp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + pci = &lpp->pci; + dev = pci->dev; + + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "linux,pci-domain", &lpp->id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get domain id, errno %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "dbi"); + if (!res) + return -ENXIO; + + pci->dbi_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) + return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base); + + lpp->core_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(lpp->core_clk)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(lpp->core_clk); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "failed to get clks: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + lpp->core_rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(lpp->core_rst)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(lpp->core_rst); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "failed to get resets: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = device_property_match_string(dev, "device_type", "pci"); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to find pci device type: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "reset-assert-ms", + &lpp->rst_interval)) + lpp->rst_interval = RST_INTRVL_DFT_MS; + + if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "max-link-speed", &lpp->link_gen)) + lpp->link_gen = 0; /* Fallback to auto */Is it possible to use of_pci_get_max_link_speed here instead?Thanks for pointing it. of_pci_get_max_link_speed() can be used here. I will update it in the next patch revision.I just remember, earlier we were using of_pci_get_max_link_speed() itself. As per reviewer comments changed to device_property_read_u32() to maintain symmetry in parsing device tree properties from device node. Let me know your view.I couldn't find an earlier version of this series that used of_pci_get_max_link_speed, have I missed it somewhere?
It happened in our internal review.What's your suggestion please, either to go with symmetry in parsing "device_property_read_u32()" or with pci helper function "of_pci_get_max_link_speed"?
+ + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "app"); + if (!res) + return -ENXIO; + + lpp->app_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(lpp->app_base)) + return PTR_ERR(lpp->app_base); + + ret = intel_pcie_ep_rst_init(lpp); + if (ret) + return ret;Given that this is called from a function '..._get_resources' I don't think we should be resetting anything here.Agree. I will move it out of get_resources().+ + lpp->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "pciephy"); + if (IS_ERR(lpp->phy)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(lpp->phy); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "couldn't get pcie-phy: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + return 0; +} + +static void intel_pcie_deinit_phy(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + phy_exit(lpp->phy); +} + +static int intel_pcie_wait_l2(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + u32 value; + int ret; + + if (lpp->max_speed < PCIE_LINK_SPEED_GEN3) + return 0; + + /* Send PME_TURN_OFF message */ + pcie_app_wr_mask(lpp, PCIE_APP_MSG_XMT_PM_TURNOFF, + PCIE_APP_MSG_XMT_PM_TURNOFF, PCIE_APP_MSG_CR); + + /* Read PMC status and wait for falling into L2 link state */ + ret = readl_poll_timeout(lpp->app_base + PCIE_APP_PMC, value, + (value & PCIE_APP_PMC_IN_L2), 20, + jiffies_to_usecs(5 * HZ)); + if (ret) + dev_err(lpp->pci.dev, "PCIe link enter L2 timeout!\n"); + + return ret; +} + +static void intel_pcie_turn_off(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + if (dw_pcie_link_up(&lpp->pci)) + intel_pcie_wait_l2(lpp); + + /* Put EP in reset state */EP?End point device. I will update it.Is this not a host bridge controller?It is PERST#, signals hardware reset to the End point . /* Put EP in reset state */ intel_pcie_device_rst_assert(lpp);OK.+ intel_pcie_device_rst_assert(lpp); + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY, 0, PCI_COMMAND); +} + +static int intel_pcie_host_setup(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + int ret; + + intel_pcie_core_rst_assert(lpp); + intel_pcie_device_rst_assert(lpp); + + ret = phy_init(lpp->phy); + if (ret) + return ret; + + intel_pcie_core_rst_deassert(lpp); + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpp->core_clk); + if (ret) { + dev_err(lpp->pci.dev, "Core clock enable failed: %d\n", ret); + goto clk_err; + } + + intel_pcie_rc_setup(lpp); + ret = intel_pcie_app_logic_setup(lpp); + if (ret) + goto app_init_err; + + ret = intel_pcie_setup_irq(lpp); + if (!ret) + return ret; + + intel_pcie_turn_off(lpp); +app_init_err: + clk_disable_unprepare(lpp->core_clk); +clk_err: + intel_pcie_core_rst_assert(lpp); + intel_pcie_deinit_phy(lpp); + return ret; +} + +static ssize_t +pcie_link_status_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + char *buf) +{ + u32 reg, width, gen; + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp; + + lpp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + reg = pcie_rc_cfg_rd(lpp, PCIE_LCTLSTS); + width = FIELD_GET(PCIE_LCTLSTS_NEGOTIATED_LINK_WIDTH, reg); + gen = FIELD_GET(PCIE_LCTLSTS_LINK_SPEED, reg); + if (gen > lpp->max_speed) + return -EINVAL; + + return sprintf(buf, "Port %2u Width x%u Speed %s GT/s\n", lpp->id, + width, pcie_link_gen_to_str(gen)); +} +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(pcie_link_status); + +static ssize_t pcie_speed_store(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t len) +{ + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp; + unsigned long val; + int ret; + + lpp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (val > lpp->max_speed) + return -EINVAL; + + lpp->link_gen = val; + intel_pcie_max_speed_setup(lpp); + intel_pcie_speed_change_disable(lpp); + intel_pcie_speed_change_enable(lpp); + + return len; +} +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(pcie_speed); + +/* + * Link width change on the fly is not always successful. + * It also depends on the partner. + */ +static ssize_t pcie_width_store(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t len) +{ + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp; + unsigned long val; + + lpp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + if (kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (val > lpp->max_width) + return -EINVAL; + + lpp->lanes = val; + intel_pcie_max_link_width_setup(lpp); + + return len; +} +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(pcie_width);You mentioned that a use-case for changing width/speed on the fly was to control power consumption (and this also helps debugging issues). As I understand there is no current support for this in the kernel - yet it is something that would provide value. I haven't looked in much detail, however as I understand the PCI spec allows an upstream partner to change the link speed and retrain. (I'm not sure about link width). Given that we already have [current,max]_link_[speed,width] is sysfs for each PCI device, it would seem natural to extend this to allow for writing a max width or speed. So ideally this type of thing would be moved to the core or at least in the dwc driver. This way the benefits can be applied to more devices on larger PCI fabrics - Though perhaps others here will have a different view and I'm keen to hear them. I'm keen to limit the differences between the DWC controller drivers and unify common code - thus it would be helpful to have a justification as to why this is only relevant for this controller. For user-space only control, it is possible to achieve what you have here with userspace utilities (something like setpci) (assuming the standard looking registers you currently access are exposed in the normal config space way - though PCIe capabilities). My suggestion would be to drop these changes and later add something that can benefit more devices. In any case if these changes stay within this driver then it would be helpful to move them to a separate patch.Sure, i will submit these entity in separate patch.Please ensure that all supporting macros, functions and defines go with that other patch as well please.Sure.+ +static struct attribute *pcie_cfg_attrs[] = { + &dev_attr_pcie_link_status.attr, + &dev_attr_pcie_speed.attr, + &dev_attr_pcie_width.attr, + NULL, +}; +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(pcie_cfg); + +static int intel_pcie_sysfs_init(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + return devm_device_add_groups(lpp->pci.dev, pcie_cfg_groups); +} + +static void __intel_pcie_remove(struct intel_pcie_port *lpp) +{ + pcie_rc_cfg_wr_mask(lpp, PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER, + 0, PCI_COMMAND); + intel_pcie_core_irq_disable(lpp); + intel_pcie_turn_off(lpp); + clk_disable_unprepare(lpp->core_clk); + intel_pcie_core_rst_assert(lpp); + intel_pcie_deinit_phy(lpp); +} + +static int intel_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct pcie_port *pp = &lpp->pci.pp; + + dw_pcie_host_deinit(pp); + __intel_pcie_remove(lpp); + + return 0; +} + +static int __maybe_unused intel_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) +{ + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + int ret; + + intel_pcie_core_irq_disable(lpp); + ret = intel_pcie_wait_l2(lpp); + if (ret) + return ret; + + intel_pcie_deinit_phy(lpp); + clk_disable_unprepare(lpp->core_clk); + return ret; +} + +static int __maybe_unused intel_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) +{ + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + return intel_pcie_host_setup(lpp); +} + +static int intel_pcie_rc_init(struct pcie_port *pp) +{ + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev); + int ret; + + /* RC/host initialization */ + ret = intel_pcie_host_setup(lpp); + if (ret) + return ret;Insert new line here.Ok.+ ret = intel_pcie_sysfs_init(lpp); + if (ret) + __intel_pcie_remove(lpp); + return ret; +} + +int intel_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp) +{ + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); + + dev_dbg(pci->dev, "PCIe MSI/MSIx is handled by MSI in x86 processor\n");What about other processors? (Noting that this driver doesn't depend on any specific ARCH in the KConfig).Agree. i will mark the dependency in Kconfig.OK, please also see how other drivers use the COMPILE_TEST Kconfig option.Ok sure.I'd suggest that the dev_dbg just becomes a code comment.Ok+ return 0; +} + +u64 intel_pcie_cpu_addr(struct dw_pcie *pcie, u64 cpu_addr) +{ + return cpu_addr + BUS_IATU_OFFS; +} + +static const struct dw_pcie_ops intel_pcie_ops = { + .cpu_addr_fixup = intel_pcie_cpu_addr, +}; + +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops intel_pcie_dw_ops = { + .host_init = intel_pcie_rc_init, + .msi_host_init = intel_pcie_msi_init, +}; + +static const struct intel_pcie_soc pcie_data = { + .pcie_ver = 0x520A, + .pcie_atu_offset = 0xC0000, + .num_viewport = 3, +}; + +static int intel_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + const struct intel_pcie_soc *data; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct intel_pcie_port *lpp; + struct pcie_port *pp; + struct dw_pcie *pci; + int ret; + + lpp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpp), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!lpp) + return -ENOMEM; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpp); + pci = &lpp->pci; + pci->dev = dev; + pp = &pci->pp; + + ret = intel_pcie_get_resources(pdev); + if (ret) + return ret; + + data = device_get_match_data(dev); + pci->ops = &intel_pcie_ops; + pci->version = data->pcie_ver; + pci->atu_base = pci->dbi_base + data->pcie_atu_offset; + pp->ops = &intel_pcie_dw_ops; + + ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "cannot initialize host\n"); + return ret; + }Add a new line after the closing brace.Ok+ /* Intel PCIe doesn't configure IO region, so configure + * viewport to not to access IO region during register + * read write operations. + */ + pci->num_viewport = data->num_viewport; + dev_info(dev, + "Intel AXI PCIe Root Complex Port %d Init Done\n", lpp->id); + return ret; +} + +static const struct dev_pm_ops intel_pcie_pm_ops = { + SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_pcie_suspend_noirq, + intel_pcie_resume_noirq) +}; + +static const struct of_device_id of_intel_pcie_match[] = { + { .compatible = "intel,lgm-pcie", .data = &pcie_data }, + {} +}; + +static struct platform_driver intel_pcie_driver = { + .probe = intel_pcie_probe, + .remove = intel_pcie_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "intel-lgm-pcie",Is there a reason why the we use intel-lgm-pcie here and pcie-intel-axi elsewhere? What does lgm mean?lgm is the name of intel SoC. I will name it to pcie-intel-axi to be generic.I'm keen to ensure that it is consistently named. I've seen other comments regarding what the name should be - I don't have a strong opinion though I do think that *-axi may be too generic.This PCIe driver is for the Intel Gateway SoCs. So how about naming it is as "pcie-intel-gw"; pcie-intel-gw.c and Kconfig as PCIE_INTEL_GW.I don't have a problem with this, though others may have differing views.
Sure. thank you.
Thanks, Andrew MurrayRegards, DilipOk, i will check and get back to you on this. Regards,Thanks, Andrew MurrayDilipThanks, Andrew MurrayThanks, Andrew Murray+ .of_match_table = of_intel_pcie_match, + .pm = &intel_pcie_pm_ops, + }, +}; +builtin_platform_driver(intel_pcie_driver); -- 2.11.0
