Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: ethernet: atheros: atlx: Use PCI generic definitions instead of private duplicates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:12 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:27 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[]
> > Subsystem specific local PCI #defines without generic
> > naming is poor style and makes treewide grep and
> > refactoring much more difficult.
> 
> Don't worry, we have the same objectives.  I totally agree that local
> #defines are a bad thing, which is why I proposed this project in the
> first place.

Hi again Bjorn.

I didn't know that was your idea.  Good idea.

> I'm just saying that this is a "first-patch" sort of learning project
> and I think it'll avoid some list spamming and discouragement if we
> can figure out the scope and shake out some of the teething problems
> ahead of time.  I don't want to end up with multiple versions of
> dozens of little 2-3 patch series posted every week or two.

Great, that's sensible.

> I'd rather be able to deal with a whole block of them at one time.

Also very sensible.

> > 2: Show that you compiled the object files and verified
> >    where possible that there are no object file changes.
> 
> Do you have any pointers for the best way to do this?  Is it as simple
> as comparing output of "objdump -d"?

Generically, yes.

I have a little script that does the equivalent of:

<git reset>
make <foo.o>
mv <foo.o> <foo.o>.old
patch -P1 < <foo_patch>
make <foo.o>
mv <foo.o> <foo.o>.new
diff -urN <(objdump -d <foo.o>.old) <(objdump -d <foo.o>.new)

But it's not foolproof as gcc does not guarantee
compilation repeatability.

And some subsystems Makefiles do not allow per-file
compilation.




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux