On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:56 PM John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 20/06/2019 13:42, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > For patches that go to a soc maintainer for merge, we're asking that > > people don't cc arm@xxxxxxxxxx directly. > > > > We prefer to keep that alias mostly for pull requests from other > > maintainers and patches we might have a reason to apply directly. > > Otherwise we risk essentially getting all of linux-arm-kernel into > > this mailbox as well. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Olof > > > > Hi Olof, > > Can do in future. > > The specific reason here for me to cc arm@xxxxxxxxxx was that I wanted > to at least make the maintainers aware that we intend to send some > patches outside the "arm soc" domain through their tree, * below. That's fine -- but it's usually better to cc us individually in those cases. We normally go find the patches on the lists if/as needed when we see them come in as well. -Olof
