On 2019-06-13 7:30 a.m., Jon Mason wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 04:30:50PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >> This is another resend as there has been no feedback since v4. >> Seems Jon has been MIA this past cycle so hopefully he appears on the >> list soon. >> >> I've addressed the feedback so far and rebased on the latest kernel >> and would like this to be considered for merging this cycle. >> >> The only outstanding issue I know of is that it still will not work >> with IDT hardware, but ntb_transport doesn't work with IDT hardware >> and there is still no sensible common infrastructure to support >> ntb_peer_mw_set_trans(). Thus, I decline to consider that complication >> in this patchset. However, I'll be happy to review work that adds this >> feature in the future. >> >> Also, as the port number and resource index stuff is a bit complicated, >> I made a quick out of tree test fixture to ensure it's correct[1]. As >> an excerise I also wrote some test code[2] using the upcomming KUnit >> feature. > > Sorry for the delay. The patch is now in the ntb-next branch. We've > missed window for 5.2, but it will be in the 5.3 pull request (barring > last minute comments). Thanks Jon! Logan
