On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 12:32:31AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The code in pci_dev_keep_suspended() is relatively hard to follow due
> to the negative checks in it and in its callers and the function has
> a possible side-effect (disabling the PME) which doesn't really match
> its role.
>
> For this reason, move the PME disablig from pci_dev_keep_suspended()
^^^^^^^^
disabling
> to a separate function and change the semantics (and name) of the
> rest of it, so that 'true' is returned when the device needs to be
> resumed (and not the other way around). Change the callers of
> pci_dev_keep_suspended() accordingly.
>
> While at it, make the code flow in pci_pm_poweroff() reflect the
> pci_pm_suspend() more closely to avoid arbitrary differences between
> them.
>
> This is a cosmetic change with no intention to alter behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
