Re: [PATCH V5 10/16] dt-bindings: PCI: tegra: Add device tree support for T194

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/13/2019 8:50 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:20 AM Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 4/26/2019 9:13 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:49:58AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
Add support for Tegra194 PCIe controllers. These controllers are based
on Synopsys DesignWare core IP.

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

+- nvidia,bpmp: Must contain a phandle to BPMP controller node.
+- nvidia,controller-id : Controller specific ID
+    0: C0
+    1: C1
+    2: C2
+    3: C3
+    4: C4
+    5: C5

We don't normal put device indexes into DT. Why do you need this.
Perhaps for accessing the BPMP? If so, make nvidia,bpmp a phandle+cell.
BPMP needs to know the controller number to enable it hence it needs to be
passed to BPMP. Just for accessing BPMP, I already added 'nvidia,bpmp' property.

Then make nvidia,bpmp take the phandle and this number.
Ok. I'll take care of it in next patch series.



+- nvidia,disable-aspm-states: Controls advertisement of ASPM states
+    bit-0 to '1': Disables advertisement of ASPM-L0s
+    bit-1 to '1': Disables advertisement of ASPM-L1. This also disables
+                   advertisement of ASPM-L1.1 and ASPM-L1.2
+    bit-2 to '1': Disables advertisement of ASPM-L1.1
+    bit-3 to '1': Disables advertisement of ASPM-L1.2

Can't this cover what 'supports-clkreq' does?
Well, they are related partially. i.e. if a platform doesn't have 'supports-clkreq' set,
then, by definition, it can't advertise support for ASPM L1.1 and L1.2 states. But, ASPM-L0s
and ASPM-L1 states don't depend on 'supports-clkreq' property.
Having this property gives more granularity as to support for which particular ASPM state
shouldn't be advertised by the root port.

Okay, then it should be a common property then.
I'm planning to remove this given we have sysfs way (Heiner's patch series @
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=107392 to control which ASPM states
can be enabled run time. In case if that is not going to work for a given use case, I'll push
patches separately for controlling ASPM states advertisement/working.


Rob





[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux