Re: [PATCH 22/30] PCI: tegra: Access endpoint config only if PCIe link is up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry, somehow I forgot to respond to this.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:13:29PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> On 15-Apr-19 7:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:06:10PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> >> On 12-Apr-19 8:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:30:22PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> >>>> On 12-Apr-19 1:45 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:33:47PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> >>>>>> Add PCIe link up check in config read and write callback functions
> >>>>>> before accessing endpoint config registers.
> >>>>>>  static int tegra_pcie_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> >>>>>>  				  int where, int size, u32 *value)
> >>>>>>  {
> >>>>>> +	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
> >>>>>> +	struct pci_dev *bridge;
> >>>>>> +	struct tegra_pcie_port *port;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>>  	if (bus->number == 0)
> >>>>>>  		return pci_generic_config_read32(bus, devfn, where, size,
> >>>>>>  						 value);
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> +	bridge = pcie_find_root_port(bus->self);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +	list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, list)
> >>>>>> +		if (port->index + 1 == PCI_SLOT(bridge->devfn))
> >>>>>> +			break;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +	/* If there is no link, then there is no device */
> >>>>>> +	if (!tegra_pcie_link_status(port)) {
> >>>>> This is racy and you should avoid it if possible.  The link could go down
> >>>>> between calling tegra_pcie_link_status() and issuing the config read/write.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If your driver is to be reliable, it must be able to handle any bad
> >>>>> consequence of issuing that config read/write anyway, so I think it's
> >>>>> better if it doesn't even bother checking whether the link is up.
> >>>> This change is made based on similar check present in dwc driver
> >>>> dw_pcie_valid_device(), reasons for making this change in Tegra might
> >>>> differ dwc.
> >>> Yes, you won't be surprised to learn that I don't like the similar
> >>> checks in dwc, altera, xilinx, and xilinx-nwl either :)  I raise this
> >>> issue every time I see it, but I can't remember if I've mentioned dwc
> >>> specifically.
> >>>
> >>> We need to either eradicate this pattern of checking for link up, or
> >>> include a comment about why it is absolutely necessary.
> >> This patch is created to address below scenario in our downstream kernel,
> >> 1) Our platform has WiFi on one slot and GPU in another.
> >> 2) During WiFi OFF, link is put in L2 and it goes through hot reset
> >> when turning ON WiFi (since Tegra doesn't support hot-plug).
> >> 3) Whenever x11 server is started it scans the PCIe bus for video devices.
> >> Here PCIe configuration registers of all devices are read to find out
> >> all available video devices.
> >> 4) If "x11 server" started with WiFi OFF, then we are seeing "response
> >> decoding error"(Tegra AFI module specific error).
> > Probably happens with lspci too.  I guess this is when you try to read
> > the WiFi device config space?
> Yes, happens with lspci when trying to read WiFi device config space.
> >> Best solution we came up with is to have link up check in config access
> >> callback functions.
> > Can you check for "response decoding error" in the config accessor and
> > return 0xffffffff if you see it?
> "Response decoding error" is informed by an
> interrupt(tegra_pcie_isr()), we have to add polling logic in config
> accessor to check if config access caused "response decoding error"
> or not. This will increase config access time.

Config access is never in a performance path, so the access time
doesn't matter.

> Also sometimes BAR access can also cause "Response decoding error", so
> matching "Response decoding error" to a particular config access is
> going to be difficult.

I'm surprised your hardware can't distinguish a failed config access
from an unclaimed MMIO access.

> >>>> Intention here is to reduce the number of AER errors when device is
> >>>> falling off the bus or going through hot reset. So racy condition here is
> >>>> OK
> >>> I'm not convinced about this.  The issues you mention need to be
> >>> solved in a generic way, not a tegra-specific way.
> >>>
> >>> We don't want to end up with code that silently avoids the config
> >>> access 99.99% of the time, but once in a blue moon, we lose the race
> >>> (the device stops responding after we've determined the link is up)
> >>> and the access causes a mysterious AER error that we have no way to
> >>> debug.
> >>>
> >>>>>> +		*value = 0xffffffff;
> >>>>>> +		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> >>>>>> +	}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>>  	return pci_generic_config_read(bus, devfn, where, size, value);
> >>>>>>  }



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux