On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 05:27:31AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 22:07 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 06:27 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > > > Paul McKenney attempted to update all email addresses @linux.vnet.ibm.com > > > > to @linux.ibm.com in commit 1dfddcdb95c4 > > > > ("MAINTAINERS: Update from @linux.vnet.ibm.com to @linux.ibm.com"), but > > > > some still remained. > > > > > > > > We update the remaining email addresses in MAINTAINERS, hopefully finally > > > > catching all cases for good. > > > > > > Perhaps update all the similar addresses in other files too > > > > > > $ git grep --name-only 'linux\.vnet\.ibm\.com' | wc -l > > > 315 > > > > A good number of them are no longer valid. So I'm not sure it's worth > > updating them en masse to addresses that won't ever work. > > > > We have git now, we don't need email addresses in files, they're just > > prone to bitrot like this. > > > > Should we just change them all like so? > > > > -arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts: * Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > +arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts: * Josh Boyer (IBM) > > > > To indicate the author was at IBM when they wrote it? > > If that's desired, perhaps: > > $ git grep -P --name-only '<?[\w\.]+(?:@| at )linux\.vnet\.ibm\.com>?' | \ > grep -vP '\.mailmap|MAINTAINERS' | \ > xargs perl -p -i -e 's/<?[\w\.]+(?:@|\ at\ )linux\.vnet\.ibm\.com>?/(IBM)/g' > > > Or should we try and update them with current addresses? Though then the > > authors might start getting mails they don't want. > > That'd be my preference. > > If authors get emails they don't want, then those contact > emails should be removed. I have updated most of mine, with one more installment of patches to go into the next merge window and another into the merge window after that. More churn than I would have expected, though. If my email address were to change again, I would instead go with the "(IBM)" approach and let the git log and MAINTAINERS file keep the contact information. Not that we get to update the git log, of course. ;-) I might not have bothered except for combining with the SPDX-tag commits. Thanx, Paul