On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 15:58 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > We did that internally. You really don't want me telling engineers to > > post to the list *first* without running things by me to get the basics > > right. Not to start with, at least. > > Hi David, > > I am obviously in favour of internal review and I do not question it was > carried out internally, I just kindly ask developers to drop review tags > given internally when going to public mailing lists - I understand it is > churn for you but I prefer them to be given explicitly. Sure, I've provided mine in public now. I will attempt to remember your preference, although I'm not sure I think it's necessary. What's the failure mode we're protecting against here? That my engineers are lying and have *faked* my reviewed-by tag? Don't you think I'd *eat* them if I ever found that happening? What's next? That you only accept such tags in signed email, so that the dishonest engineer in question can't *fake* an email from me to the list? They know I'm afflicted by Exchange so they can always send that fake message with a message-id matching another message they know is already in my inbox, so Exchange will helpfully discard theirs. :)
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
