Re: [pci:review/pci/resource 8/21] drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:2919:6: sparse: symbol 'nvme_rescan_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [pci:review/pci/resource 8/21] drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:2919:6: sparse: symbol 'nvme_rescan_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static?
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:40:12 -0700
In-reply-to: <201903262317.Xf94y2xJ%lkp@intel.com>
References: <201903262317.Xf94y2xJ%lkp@intel.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

Please make sure all nvme patches go by the nvme maintainers and have
an ACK, btw.  I've not even seen this patch before.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pci:review/pci/resource 8/21] drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:2919:6: sparse: symbol 'nvme_rescan_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static?
  - From: Bjorn Helgaas

References:
- [pci:review/pci/resource 8/21] drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:2919:6: sparse: symbol 'nvme_rescan_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static?
  - From: kbuild test robot

Prev by Date: [pci:review/pci/resource 8/21] drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:2919:6: sparse: symbol 'nvme_rescan_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: al: Add Amazon Annapurna Labs PCIe host controller driver
Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH pci] nvme-pci: nvme_rescan_prepare() can be static
Next by thread: Re: [pci:review/pci/resource 8/21] drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:2919:6: sparse: symbol 'nvme_rescan_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DMA Engine] [Linux Coverity] [Linux USB] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Greybus]

Powered by Linux