On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:57:32PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > The dwc driver is showing an interesting level of brokeness, as it > insists on using the "enable" register to mask/unmask MSIs, meaning > that an MSIs being generated while the interrupt is in that "disabled" > state will simply be lost. > > Let's move to the MASK register, which offers the expected semantics. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > index 29a05759a294..c3aa8b5fb51d 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void dw_pci_bottom_mask(struct irq_data *data) > bit = data->hwirq % MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL; > > pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit); > - dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, > + dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK + res, 4, > pp->irq_status[ctrl]); > } > > @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static void dw_pci_bottom_unmask(struct irq_data *data) > bit = data->hwirq % MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL; > > pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit; > - dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, > + dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK + res, 4, > pp->irq_status[ctrl]); > } > For this patch combined with the fix-up from: https://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=154218928401960&w=2 Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
