On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:09:53PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > On 9/18/18 5:32 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > > > > > >> On Sep 18, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > >>> What about the toolstack changes? Have they been accepted? I vaguely > > >>> recall there was a discussion about those changes but don't remember how > > >>> it ended. > > >>> > > >> I don't think toolstack/libxl patch has been applied yet either. > > >> > > >> > > >> "[PATCH V1 0/1] Xen/Tools: PCI reset using 'reset' SysFS attribute": > > >> https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-12/msg00664.html > > >> > > >> "[PATCH V1 1/1] Xen/libxl: Perform PCI reset using 'reset' SysFS attribute": > > >> https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-12/msg00663.html > > > > > > Will this patch work for *BSD? Roger? > > At least FreeBSD don't support pci-passthrough, so none of this works > ATM. There's no sysfs on BSD, so much of what's in libxl_pci.c will > have to be moved to libxl_linux.c when BSD support is added. > Ok. That sounds like it's OK for the initial pci 'reset' implementation in xl/libxl to be linux-only.. Thanks, -- Pasi > Thanks, Roger.
