On 01/10/18 04:23 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >> I did not realize the namespace would be available at this time. I guess >> I can give this a try, but it's going to be a fairly big change from >> what's presented here... Though, I agree it'll probably be an >> improvement. > > Thanks, if it turns out to create to much of a churn, we could defer > that to a later stage, but we can at least document it. Yeah, it's going to create a bunch of churn, but it's probably worth doing before merging because I think it will remove a bunch of complexity (ie. the need for the whole p2p client infrastructure because we now only need to worry about only one namespace at a time, instead of needing to find a p2p device that works with all namespaces at once). I'll try to get a v9 with this change published in the next day or two. Logan
