Re: A question about pcim_iomap_regions() and Managed Device Resource API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kevin,

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:15:01PM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> HI, linux-pci developers,
> 
> There are very few Ethernet drivers which use
> pcim_iomap_regions(); for example,
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c.
> 
> My question is: why do they use this
> Managed Device Resource API and not
> the regular Device Resource API (ioremap() for example), which is used in
> **most** Ethernet Linux device drivers, for example, in I40E driver:
> 
> ...
>     err = pci_request_mem_regions(pdev, i40e_driver_name);
>     ...
>     hw->hw_addr = ioremap(pci_resource_start(pdev, 0), pf->ioremap_len);
> ...
> 
> Is there some inherent HW feature in r8169 (or the other
> drivers, see list below) which requires using this API ? Is usage
> of this API (the managed devices, with pcim_iomap_regions(), etc) is
> mandatory for these device drivers, and cannot be
> use in most drivers (like I40E and most of the others) ?
> 
> The other Linux Ethenet drivers that use
> pcim_iomap_regions() are:
> amd/xgbe, cavium/common/cavium_ptp.c, intel/ice/ice_main.c,
> oki-semi/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_main.c, stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pci.c,
> synopsys/dwc-xlgmac-pci.c and toshiba/tc35815.c.

The choice of the managed API (pcim_iomap_regions(), etc) vs the
regular one (ioremap()) has nothing to do with the features of the
hardware.  It's completely up to the driver writer.  The managed API
[1] is intended to make things easier for the driver writer by
simplifying error and cleanup paths.

Bjorn

[1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux