Re: [PATCH v7 02/13] PCI/P2PDMA: Add sysfs group to display p2pmem stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 12:15 -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
+AD4 On 2018-09-25 11:29 a.m., Bart Van Assche wrote:
+AD4 +AD4 On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 10:22 -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AEAAQA -83,9 +-132,14 +AEAAQA static int pci+AF8-p2pdma+AF8-setup(struct pci+AF8-dev +ACo-pdev)
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  	pdev-+AD4-p2pdma +AD0 p2p+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +-	error +AD0 sysfs+AF8-create+AF8-group(+ACY-pdev-+AD4-dev.kobj, +ACY-p2pmem+AF8-group)+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +-	if (error)
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +-		goto out+AF8-pool+AF8-destroy+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +-
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  	return 0+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  out+AF8-pool+AF8-destroy:
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +-	pdev-+AD4-p2pdma +AD0 NULL+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  	gen+AF8-pool+AF8-destroy(p2p-+AD4-pool)+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  out:
+AD4 +AD4 +AD4  	devm+AF8-kfree(+ACY-pdev-+AD4-dev, p2p)+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 
+AD4 +AD4 This doesn't look right to me. Shouldn't devm+AF8-remove+AF8-action() be called instead
+AD4 +AD4 of devm+AF8-kfree() if sysfs+AF8-create+AF8-group() fails?
+AD4 
+AD4 That makes no sense to me. We are reversing a devm+AF8-kzalloc() not a
+AD4 custom action....

In case what I wrote was not clear: both devm+AF8-kzalloc() and
devm+AF8-add+AF8-action+AF8-or+AF8-reset() have to be reversed if sysfs+AF8-create+AF8-group() fails.
devm+AF8-add+AF8-action+AF8-or+AF8-reset() calls devres+AF8-add(). The latter function adds an
element to the dev-+AD4-devres+AF8-head list. So I think that only calling devm+AF8-kfree()
if sysfs+AF8-create+AF8-group() fails will lead to corruption of the dev-+AD4-devres+AF8-head
list.

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux