On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:33:09PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
> > +static int __maybe_unused mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>
> I am not sure I understand why you need to suspend the device in the
> "noirq" phase. Isn't it fine to do that in the regular suspend phase?
>
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + const struct mtk_pcie_soc *soc = pcie->soc;
> > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port;
> > +
> > + if (!soc->pm_support)
> > + return 0;
I have an additional comment on this. Isn't there a nicer and more
generic way to detect whether the soc supports pm rather than using
this utterly ugly pm_support static variable ?
Can't we sort out at core level (ie by not "registering" dev_pm_ops) ?
How is this situation handled in other drivers ?
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> > + if (list_empty(&pcie->ports))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, list) {
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(port->pipe_ck);
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(port->obff_ck);
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(port->axi_ck);
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(port->aux_ck);
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(port->ahb_ck);
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(port->sys_ck);
> > + phy_power_off(port->phy);
> > + phy_exit(port->phy);
> > + }
> > +
> > + mtk_pcie_subsys_powerdown(pcie);
>
> Why not gate clocks, unconditionally not depending on if pm_support is
> set or not, during system suspend?
>
> I understand that you for some SoCs needs also to restore registers
> during system resume, but that's a different thing, isn't it?
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused mtk_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + const struct mtk_pcie_soc *soc = pcie->soc;
> > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port, *tmp;
> > +
> > + if (!soc->pm_support)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (list_empty(&pcie->ports))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (dev->pm_domain) {
> > + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>
> I noticed, Lorenzo wanted me to comment on this, so here it goes.
>
> I guess the reason to why you make these pm_runtime_*() calls, is
> because you want to restore the actions taken during
> mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq() (which calls mtk_pcie_subsys_powerdown ->
> pm_runtime_disable|put*())?
>
> If that's the case, I would rather avoid calling pm_runtime_disable()
> and pm_runtime_put() via mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(), simply because it
> isn't needed.
>
> Of course, another option is to follow the pattern in
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon.c.
>
> Overall, I am also wondering why only runtime PM is used when there is
> a PM domain attached to the device? That seems to make the logic in
> the driver, unnecessary complicated. Why not use runtime
> unconditionally and thus enable it during ->probe()?
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + clk_prepare_enable(pcie->free_ck);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &pcie->ports, list)
> > + mtk_pcie_enable_port(port);
> > +
> > + /* In case of EP was removed while system suspend. */
> > + if (list_empty(&pcie->ports))
> > + mtk_pcie_subsys_powerdown(pcie);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dev_pm_ops mtk_pcie_pm_ops = {
> > + SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq,
> > + mtk_pcie_resume_noirq)
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_v1 = {
> > .ops = &mtk_pcie_ops,
> > .startup = mtk_pcie_startup_port,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_mt2712 = {
> > + .pm_support = true,
> > .ops = &mtk_pcie_ops_v2,
> > .startup = mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2,
> > .setup_irq = mtk_pcie_setup_irq,
> > @@ -1210,6 +1275,7 @@ static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_mt2712 = {
> >
> > static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_mt7622 = {
> > .need_fix_class_id = true,
> > + .pm_support = true,
> > .ops = &mtk_pcie_ops_v2,
> > .startup = mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2,
> > .setup_irq = mtk_pcie_setup_irq,
> > @@ -1229,6 +1295,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mtk_pcie_driver = {
> > .name = "mtk-pcie",
> > .of_match_table = mtk_pcie_ids,
> > .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> > + .pm = &mtk_pcie_pm_ops,
> > },
> > };
> > builtin_platform_driver(mtk_pcie_driver);
> > --
> > 2.6.4
> >
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
