On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:18:19PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 03:03:32PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > I applied this to for-linus with the following changelog. Let me know > > if I didn't understand this correctly. I changed the comment in > > pciehp_power_on_slot() so it doesn't say "sticky" to avoid confusion > > with the PCI spec concept of sticky register bits (ROS, RWS, RW1CS). > > Perfect! Thanks for queueing this up. I'll drop this one from the rest > of the series, which will need at least a v3 to fix a dumb mistake in > pointed out in review, and I'll get the order to better sense (or maybe > split into independent patch sets). Are you still planning a v3? I really want to get this in for v4.20 and I think there's probably some integration to be done with Lukas' series (which I haven't applied yet either). I rebased my branches to v4.19-rc4 to avoid a merge conflict Lukas pointed out.
