Hi, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> + unsigned int immediate:1; /* Supports Immediate Readiness */ > > That name is a bit too generic. immediate_ready (or imm_ready if you > need it short) would be a lot more descriptive. That can be easily patched. I'll until tomorrow for more comments then send a v2 -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
