Should a PCIe Link Down event set the PCI_DEV_DISCONNECTED bit?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Should a PCIe Link Down event set the PCI_DEV_DISCONNECTED bit?
- From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:38:50 -0500
- Cc: "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bolen, Austin" <austin_bolen@xxxxxxxx>, "alex_gagniuc@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <Alex_Gagniuc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
Hi,
I was under the impression that a DLLSC or PDSC would trigger the
PCI_DEV_DISCONNECTED bit to be set, blocking any further config access.
Although I'm not seeing that happen after a "Slot(xxx): Link Down"
event. I suspect my understanding is then wrong. Or maybe
PCI_DEV_DISCONNECTED means something else.
In the latter case, does it not make sense to have a separate bit to say
"Don't touch this device"?
Alex
[Index of Archives]
[DMA Engine]
[Linux Coverity]
[Linux USB]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Greybus]