On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:41 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:23:05PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > This patch introduce some help routines used by next patch. It aims to
> > ease reviewing, while the next patch will concentrate on algorithm.
> >
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> > index 36622b5..8113d2c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> > @@ -123,6 +123,44 @@ static int device_is_dependent(struct device *dev, void *target)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +struct pos_info {
> > + struct device *pos;
> > + struct device *tail;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* caller takes the devices_kset->list_lock */
> > +static int descendants_reorder_after_pos(struct device *dev,
> > + void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct device *pos;
> > + struct pos_info *p = data;
> > +
> > + pos = p->pos;
> > + pr_debug("devices_kset: Moving %s after %s\n",
> > + dev_name(dev), dev_name(pos));
> > + device_for_each_child(dev, p, descendants_reorder_after_pos);
> > + /* children at the tail */
> > + list_move(&dev->kobj.entry, &pos->kobj.entry);
> > + /* record the right boundary of the section */
> > + if (p->tail == NULL)
> > + p->tail = dev;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* iterate over an open section */
> > +#define list_opensect_for_each_reverse(cur, left, right) \
> > + for (cur = right->prev; cur == left; cur = cur->prev)
> > +
> > +static bool is_consumer(struct device *query, struct device *supplier)
> > +{
> > + struct device_link *link;
> > + /* todo, lock protection */
> > + list_for_each_entry(link, &supplier->links.consumers, s_node)
> > + if (link->consumer == query)
> > + return true;
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> You are adding code that no one uses yet, making this impossible to
> review as I don't know what to expect. I shouldn't have to read the
> second patch and have to flip back and forth to try to figure it out :(
>
OK, I had thought the less code in [2/3] will ease the reviewing
> sorry, please break this series up in a better way to make it simpler to
> review.
>
OK.
Regards,
Pingfan
