Re: [v4] PCI: improve host drivers compile test coverage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lorenzo,


On 18-06-15 05:58 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:11:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:09:35AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[+Jan, Ley Foon, RMK]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:02:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:31:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
Add COMPILE_TEST on driver config options with it. Some ARM drivers
still have arch dependencies, so we have to keep those dependent on ARM.

Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch has the undesirable side effect that it selects PCI_DOMAINS for
sparc32:allmodconfig, which in turn results in

drivers/ata/pata_ali.c: In function 'ali_init_chipset':
drivers/ata/pata_ali.c:469:38: error:
	implicit declaration of function 'pci_domain_nr'; did you mean 'pci_iomap_wc'?

Unfortunately, 37bd62d224c82 ("PCI: Enable PCI_DOMAINS along with generic
PCI host controller") has pretty much the same result. No idea how to fix
the problem, so I won't even try.
Sorry about that.

One option would consist in removing all PCI_DOMAINS selection from
drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig and delegate it to arches even though
this would force PCI_DOMAINS selection on all ARM platforms (it is
already selected for ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM).

Or we add back arch dependency to the relevant host bridges.

Everything else I have in mind seems overkill to me given that this
patch was added to improve test coverage (we could add a default
pci_domain_nr() stub - weak or #define - that returns 0 in case arches
do not provide an implementation but do we really want to do that ?).

Thoughts appreciated.

 From the definition of PCI_DOMAINS, I suspect the original idea was that
drivers should depend on it, not select it. Especially auto-selecting
it with PCI_HOST_GENERIC seems like a bad idea to me. However, that is
just me. I'll leave it up to Bjorn to decide what if anything he wants
to do about it.
Here is a patch that should reinstate the previous behaviour but
it will make PCI_DOMAINS a visible option on ARM 32-bit systems; whether
that's acceptable that's the question I need to answer, it should
honour old configs and it does not force PCI_DOMAINS selection on
non-DT arch/arm PCI host controllers (that do not need PCI_DOMAINS
anyway so I suspect that enabling it on all ARM 32-bit platforms
should not break anything but I preferred to be cautious).
I think this change will also require a patch enabling CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS in multi_v7_defconfig and iproc_defconfig at the very least?

If I hear no complaints I will post it for inclusion, we cannot leave
things as they are.

Lorenzo

-- >8 --
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 2a78bdef9a24..1d415aeb54b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1244,8 +1244,14 @@ config PCI
  	  VESA. If you have PCI, say Y, otherwise N.
config PCI_DOMAINS
-	bool
+	bool "Support for multiple PCI domains"
  	depends on PCI
+	help
+	  Enable PCI domains kernel management. Say Y if your machine
+	  has a PCI bus hierarchy that requires more than one PCI
+	  domain (aka segment) to be correctly managed. Say N otherwise.
+
+	  If you don't know what to do here, say N.
config PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
  	def_bool PCI_DOMAINS
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
index 18fa09b3ac8f..cc9fa02d32a0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ config PCI_HOST_GENERIC
  	depends on OF
  	select PCI_HOST_COMMON
  	select IRQ_DOMAIN
-	select PCI_DOMAINS
  	help
  	  Say Y here if you want to support a simple generic PCI host
  	  controller, such as the one emulated by kvmtool.
@@ -138,7 +137,6 @@ config PCI_VERSATILE
config PCIE_IPROC
  	tristate
-	select PCI_DOMAINS
  	help
  	  This enables the iProc PCIe core controller support for Broadcom's
  	  iProc family of SoCs. An appropriate bus interface driver needs
@@ -176,7 +174,6 @@ config PCIE_IPROC_MSI
  config PCIE_ALTERA
  	bool "Altera PCIe controller"
  	depends on ARM || NIOS2 || COMPILE_TEST
-	select PCI_DOMAINS
  	help
  	  Say Y here if you want to enable PCIe controller support on Altera
  	  FPGA.




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux