On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:52 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Honghui Zhang > <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:17 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM, <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> > +static int mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) > >> > >> __maybe_unused > >> > > > > Hi, Andy, thanks for your review. > > Bjorn had point this out that at: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg656774.html > > Nice, one more maintainer with strong opinion here. > > Arnd, that's what I mentioned as a split in opinions earlier. > Any new developer or even existing contributor would be now really > confusing since maintainers asked for two different approaches on the > same matter. > Hi, Arnd, Do you have any comments about this patch? Sorry I missed the previous discussion about which should be used for this approach. thanks.
