On 01/06/18 08:30 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: > Cool, I'm glad this worked. I note though that there's really not much > difference between: > > [domain:]bus:slot.fn > > and > > [domain:]bus:slot.fn[/slot.fn[/slot.fn[/...]]] > > IOW, what's defined here as the "path:" specification doesn't require > that we start at a root bus device, it can really specify a path > starting anywhere, including the target device directly. So can we > simply extend domain:bus:slot.fn to support paths without a separate > identifier? Thanks, Yes, I think you are right. I was just hesitant to change existing behavior. But if that's the consensus I'll change it for v3. Thanks, Logan
