Hi Bjorn, On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 07:56:58AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: ... > > + return ret; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + pci->pp.root_bus_nr = -1; > > Setting root_bus_nr looks like an unrelated change that should be in a > separate patch. > > But I'm not sure why you need to set root_bus_nr at all, since > dw_pcie_host_init() always sets it. > > Some other callers of dw_pcie_host_init() do set it: > > exynos_add_pcie_port() > imx6_add_pcie_port() > armada8k_add_pcie_port() > artpec6_add_pcie_port() > dw_plat_add_pcie_port() > histb_pcie_probe() > qcom_pcie_probe() > spear13xx_add_pcie_port() > > But I don't see *why* any of these need to set it. If they don't need to > set it, they shouldn't. Mostly it's a blind copy of unnecessary code. I tested histb driver by dropping the line, and did not see anything broken. I will cook up a series to remove the code from all above drivers, and copy corresponding driver owner to comment. > And it would be nice if histb and qcom followed the structure and naming > conventions of the other drivers, i.e., they should have > histb_add_pcie_port() and qcom_add_pcie_port(). I can create a patch for histb driver, but will leave qcom one to Stanimir to decide. Shawn > > > pci->pp.ops = &kirin_pcie_host_ops; > > > > return dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp); > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
