On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 08:11:23PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: >On 05/08/18 at 08:48pm, Wei Yang wrote: >> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:14:29AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: >> >Hi Wei Yang, >> > >> >On 04/26/18 at 09:18am, Wei Yang wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:18:46AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: >> >> >The struct resource uses singly linked list to link siblings. It's not >> >> >easy to do reverse iteration on sibling list. So replace it with list_head. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi, Baoquan >> >> >> >> Besides changing the data structure, I have another proposal to do the reverse >> >> iteration. Which means it would not affect other users, if you just want a >> >> reverse iteration. >> >> >> >> BTW, I don't think Andrew suggest to use linked-list directly. What he wants >> >> is a better solution to your first proposal in >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10300819/. >> >> >> >> Below is my proposal of resource reverse iteration without changing current >> >> design. >> > >> >I got your mail and read it, then interrupted by other thing and forgot >> >replying, sorry. >> > >> >I am fine with your code change. As I said before, I have tried to change >> >code per reviewers' comment, then let reviewers decide which way is >> >better. Please feel free to post formal patches and joining discussion >> >about this issue. >> >> Yep, while I don't have a real requirement to add the reverse version, so what >> is the proper way to send a patch? >> >> A patch reply to this thread is ok? > >I am not sure either. Since my patches are still under reviewing. And >you have pasted your patch. It depends on maintainers, mainly Andrew and >other reviewers who have concerns. Ok, thanks. -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
