On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 08:55:43AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi > <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It is a balance of urgency and making sure it is extensively tested - > > I'd prefer it to go via usual release cycle (and -next) and then it will > > trickle into stable kernels, let me know if that's not OK. > > > > I would understand your point if dwc maintainers were more proactive > > in testing their respective controllers - all of them should be affected > > by this fix but I have just heard from a few of them. > > We got this patch tested by: Koen, myself, Sebastian and the folks at > Pengutronix. > > Looks like a decent amount of testing IMHO. IIUC you all tested the same dwc host bridge variant (ie imx6) - I want to understand if it works across dwc variants because this patch affects them all. > In this case I would prefer that we could fix the regression into > 4.16-rc cycle rather than waiting until 4.17. I will decide what to do shortly - I would really appreciate if other dwc host bridge maintainers (that are CC'ed) can share the testing effort. Thanks, Lorenzo
