On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems that the expression threshold_us * 1000 will never exceed the > 32-bit limits [1]. So changing the type of threshold_ns from u64 to u32 > seems sensible [2]. > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151855021100725&w=2 > [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151976318924615&w=2 > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462501 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > index 57feef2..8633fc4 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static u32 calc_l1ss_pwron(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 scale, u32 val) > > static void encode_l12_threshold(u32 threshold_us, u32 *scale, u32 *value) > { > - u64 threshold_ns = threshold_us * 1000; > + u32 threshold_ns = threshold_us * 1000; > > /* See PCIe r3.1, sec 7.33.3 and sec 6.18 */ > if (threshold_ns < 32) { > -- > 2.7.4 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
