On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:26:18PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:33:45PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > A 64-bit BAR uses the succeeding BAR for the upper bits,
> > so we cannot simply call pci_ioremap_bar() on every single BAR.
> >
> > Ignore BARs that does not have a valid resource length.
> >
> > pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 4: assigned [mem 0xc0300000-0xc031ffff 64bit]
> > pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0xc0320000-0xc03203ff 64bit]
> > pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xc0320400-0xc03204ff 64bit]
> > pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: can't ioremap BAR 1: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x0]
> > pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: failed to read BAR1
> > pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: can't ioremap BAR 3: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x0]
> > pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: failed to read BAR3
> > pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: can't ioremap BAR 5: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x0]
> > pci-endpoint-test 0000:01:00.0: failed to read BAR5
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Lorenzo/Bjorn: pci_resource_len() seems to fix my problem,
> > but is it the correct function to use here?
> > If BAR[x] is a 64-bit BAR, I'm assuming that pci_resource_len() on BAR[x+1]
> > will always return 0 (since BAR[x+1] cannot have any prefetchable/type bits
> > when BAR[x] is 64-bit).
> >
> > drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > index 320276f42653..3af31bfdcfdd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > @@ -534,6 +534,8 @@ static int pci_endpoint_test_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > }
> >
> > for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> > + if (pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) == 0)
> > + continue;
>
> Should not it be handled by checking the resource flags as you loop
> through the bar counter and incrementing the bar counter (+1) if
> IORESOURCE_MEM_64 is detected ?
I agree, pci_resource_len() is the wrong thing here. The length
(actually the entire resource[x]) *should* be zero if the slot
corresponds to the upper bits of a 64-bit BAR, but I think it would be
more natural to do this:
if (pci_resource_flags(pdev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM)
base = pci_ioremap_bar(pdev, bar);
You *could* check for IORESOURCE_MEM_64 and increment "bar" if you
find it, but I don't think that's really idiomatic, and it builds in a
little bit of unnecessary knowledge about how the PCI core maps BAR
registers to the resource[] array.
> > base = pci_ioremap_bar(pdev, bar);
> > if (!base) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to read BAR%d\n", bar);
> > --
> > 2.14.2
> >
