On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:45:30PM +0000, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > Tested-By: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Using an arc board with USB and SATA end points with a root complex PCIe > IP core version 5.00, I ran the the following tests: > - I checked that all end points were listed correctly; > - I checked that no PCI related errors was present in dmesg; > - I copied a file from arc to the USB flash drive and checked the > checksum; > - I copied a file from USB flash drive to the ARC and checked the > checksum; > - I copied a file from arc to the SATA disk and checked the checksum; > - I copied a file from SATA disk to the arc and checked the checksum; > - I copied a file from USB flash drive to the SATA disk and checked the > checksum; > - I copied a file from SATA disk to the USB flash drive and checked the > checksum; > - I checked that no PCI related errors was present in dmesg; > > Everything seemed normal to me. Thank you very much. I would still need ACKs from the respective maintainers (Joao/Jingoo/Kishon) in order to push this upstream please. Thanks, Lorenzo > On 18/12/2017 16:11, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > > Hi Lorenzo, > > Yes, I have retrieve patches and performed some basic tests without having any > problems till now. > > However, I'm still trying to test the changes with our automated system. It's > being very difficult to find a time slot available for running this tests. > > I hope in this week I could give you go/not go flag. Sorry the delay... > > Regards, > > Gustavo > > > On 18/12/2017 15:57, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > Hi Gustavo, > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38:04PM +0000, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > > Ok. I will compile and test it now. > > Have you managed to retrieve the patches and test them ? > > Thank you, > Lorenzo > > > Thanks. > > > On 14/12/2017 12:22, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:16:38PM +0000, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > > Hi Niklas and Lorenzo, > > I'm going to work on PCI software development now as told by Joao and I will > test your code now. > > I was retrieving the patches through the patchwork > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_project_linux-2Dpci_list_-3Fsubmitter-3D65580&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=bkWxpLoW-f-E3EdiDCCa0_h0PicsViasSlvIpzZvPxs&m=paO6WYeoTil-HWIJVBhwaWcIZP7r95MZNRzKMN6kprU&s=yjtNhJKPJdsHD_A52xWSD2g_YNHuLhO1YADKsPaPsio&e= and I > notice that its missing the patch 13 and 17, is this right? > > No, you just have to refine the filter, I marked the DT bindings as > ready to be applied that's why they do not show up (and by the way > you can test the series even without those two patches - that are just > DT bindings). > > Thanks, > Lorenzo > > > If not, can you give me both patches location? > > Thanks. > > > On 13/12/2017 17:21, Joao Pinto wrote: > > Hi Niklas, > > ??s 1:59 PM de 12/13/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:28:43PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > Jingoo, Joao, > > I am expecting your testing on the series and ACKs on the dwc related > patches please, according to v4 review - I will mark them as needs > review/ACK waiting for you to chime in. > > v4 thread: > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_patch_833882_&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=CQAV8rCgm2jd7m3iSWL5vBbGTqSc7yN3N7zeQDz-ZUY&s=mqyDi45qm4qE0jcm0KviYAoLHmMXMMIWEW-gAR0RKOw&e= > > > Hello Lorenzo, Jingoo, Joao, > > Tomorrow another 2 weeks has passed. > V1 of this patch series was posted on 2017-10-13. > > Sorry, I have been tight up with a debug session and not able to check this out. > Adding Gustavo in CC that is now also working in PCI software development. > I am going to check the code ASAP and we will test it as soon as the debug is > finished. > > Thanks. > > > I'm a bit worried that this patch series will not make it to linux-next > in time for this patch series to be included in the 4.16 pull request. > > Here is the V5 patch series: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_project_linux-2Dpci_list_-3Fseries-3D14364&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=CQAV8rCgm2jd7m3iSWL5vBbGTqSc7yN3N7zeQDz-ZUY&s=qXtUHFXK7_nCndQob0I0qDByBdJsL7rRjZ9cx7c847U&e= > > Perhaps any maintainer of a designware based PCIe driver could > help out and test this patch series? > > Regards, > Niklas
