On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 01:47:07PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:32:30PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:59:25PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:16:31PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote: > > > > find_first_zero_bit()'s parameter 'size' is defined in bits, > > > > not in bytes. > > > > > > > > Calling find_first_zero_bit() with the wrong size unit > > > > will lead to insidious bugs. > > > > > > > > Fix all uses of find_first_zero_bit() called with > > > > sizeof() as size argument in drivers/pci. > > > > > > > > Also had to fix broken error handling in pci_epc_epf_link() > > > > in order to do proper error handling for find_first_zero_bit(). > > > > > > > > Niklas Cassel (3): > > > > PCI: designware-ep: Fix find_first_zero_bit() usage > > > > PCI: endpoint: Fix error handling in pci_epc_epf_link() > > > > PCI: endpoint: Fix find_first_zero_bit() usage > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 8 ++++++-- > > > > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 13 ++++++++----- > > > > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > > > In the interest of making forward progress, I applied these to > > > for-linus for v4.15. > > > > > > The issues apparently have been there since v4.12-rc1, but I guess > > > this is proposed for for-linus because (a) it fixes insidious bugs > > > and (b) the endpoint framework is relatively little-used yet so > > > low-risk. Right? > > > > > > > Hello Bjorn, > > > > As far as I know, dra7xx is the only in-tree user of the endpoint > > framework. Therefore, I see no real need to rush these patches. > > > > One benefit of sending them to v4.15 would be if anyone starts > > developing endpoint support for their driver (with v4.15 as a base), > > we eliminate the risk that they might get hit by these bugs, and > > potentially waste time finding bugs that have already been found. > > > > Please note that Kishon had some last minute review comments, > > so I had to submit a V5 of the patch series. > > I missed this message (please CC me on the cover letter too next time) I > hope Bjorn can drop v4 and replace it with v5 - or I can just queue v5 > for v4.16 - just let me know please how you want to handle it. I dropped them from my for-linus tree. Lorenzo, can you take care of v5 for v4.16? Thanks!
