Hi, I sent this individual i915 patch to our CI, and it is passing on all platforms: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34822/ Is it ok if I merge this to drm-tip already? Regards, Joonas On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 13:50 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > +dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > On 11/27/2017 11:57 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as > > where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be > > reused for other domain numbers. > > > > Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of > > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). > > > > Extract the domain number from drm_device and pass it into > > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > index 9f45cfe..5a8cb79 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > @@ -419,7 +419,10 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > > > > static int i915_get_bridge_dev(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > { > > - dev_priv->bridge_dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)); > > + int domain = pci_domain_nr(dev_priv->drm.pdev->bus); > > + > > + dev_priv->bridge_dev = > > + pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)); > > if (!dev_priv->bridge_dev) { > > DRM_ERROR("bridge device not found\n"); > > return -1; > > > > -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation
