On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:29:29PM -0600, Govinda Tatti wrote:
>
> Thanks Bjorn for your review comments. Please see below for my comments.
>
> On 12/8/2017 2:24 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:21:44PM -0500, Govinda Tatti wrote:
> >>This patch exports pcie_has_flr() and it is being used by Xen pciback
> >>driver to reset (flr/slot/bus) PCI devices based on 'reset' SysFS
> >>attribute.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Govinda Tatti <Govinda.Tatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >>v3: -New
> >>
> >> drivers/pci/pci.c | 3 ++-
> >> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> >>index 6078dfc..499e922 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> >>@@ -3872,7 +3872,7 @@ static void pci_flr_wait(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >> * Returns true if the device advertises support for PCIe function level
> >> * resets.
> >> */
> >>-static bool pcie_has_flr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >>+bool pcie_has_flr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >> {
> >> u32 cap;
> >>@@ -3882,6 +3882,7 @@ static bool pcie_has_flr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >> pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, &cap);
> >> return cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_FLR;
> >> }
> >>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcie_has_flr);
> >I'd rather change pcie_flr() so you could *always* call it, and it
> >would return 0, -ENOTTY, or whatever, based on whether FLR is
> >supported. Is that feasible?
> Sure, I will add pcie_has_flr() logic inside pcie_flr() and return
> appropriate
> values as suggested by you. Do we still want to retain pcie_has_flr() and
> its usage inside pci.c?.Otherwise, I will remove it and do required cleanup.
If you can restructure the code and remove pcie_has_flr() while
retaining the existing behavior of its callers, that would be great.
Bjorn
