On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:57:46AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.
>
> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
>
> Extract the domain number from drm_device and pass it into
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 9f45cfe..5a8cb79 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -419,7 +419,10 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>
> static int i915_get_bridge_dev(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - dev_priv->bridge_dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
> + int domain = pci_domain_nr(dev_priv->drm.pdev->bus);
> +
> + dev_priv->bridge_dev =
> + pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
Maybe just pci_get_slot(pdev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)) ?
I guess if we want to be pedantic we could go for:
bus = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus)->bus;
pci_get_slot(bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0))
but I think the GPU should always be on the root bus, so the simpler
form should be fine.
> if (!dev_priv->bridge_dev) {
> DRM_ERROR("bridge device not found\n");
> return -1;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
