On 11/22/2017 2:52 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Dropping the extra mailing lists and Dave, this is a rather trivial thing.
>
> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 00:30 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
>> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
>> reused for other domain numbers.
>>
>> Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() with a domain number of 0 where we can't
>> extract the domain number. Other places, use the actual domain number from
>> the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> <SNIP>
>
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> @@ -419,7 +419,9 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>>
>> static int i915_get_bridge_dev(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> - dev_priv->bridge_dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
>> + uint16_t devfn = PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)
>
> The would have to be "unsigned int" according to the function
> signature.
Even though the return value is unsigned int, PCI_DEVFN cannot be bigger
than 16 bits.
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.14.1/source/include/uapi/linux/pci.h#L31
/*
* The PCI interface treats multi-function devices as independent
* devices. The slot/function address of each device is encoded
* in a single byte as follows:
*
* 7:3 = slot
* 2:0 = function
*/
It is common practice to use u16 for keeping devfn information in the
kernel.
>
>> +
>> + dev_priv->bridge_dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, devfn);
>
> But the most straightforward change is to simply convert to:
>
> dev_priv->bridge_dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0,
> PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
>
> Can you please resend like that.
I did this at the beginning and but, I hit a checkpatch problem with
more than 80 characters. That's why, I moved the devfn value assignment
to a different line.
>
> Looks like this is a part of abigger series, so others may prefer
> latter form too, to avoid the variable.
>
> Regards, Joonas
>
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
