On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 08:03:20PM +0100, Karol Herbst wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 04:01:16PM +0100, Karol Herbst wrote: > >> This should make systems more stable where resuming the GPU fails. This > >> can happen due to bad firmware or due to a bug within the kernel. The > >> last thing which should happen in either case is an unusable system. > >> > >> v2: do the same in nouveau_pmops_resume > >> > >> Tested-by: Karl Hastings <kazen@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c > >> index 8d4a5be3..6e4cb4f7 100644 > >> --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c > >> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c > >> @@ -792,6 +792,27 @@ nouveau_pmops_suspend(struct device *dev) > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> +static int > >> +nouveau_set_power_state_D0(struct pci_dev *pdev) > >> +{ > >> + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(pci_get_drvdata(pdev)); > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0); > >> + /* abort if anything went wrong */ > >> + if (pdev->current_state != PCI_D0) { > >> + NV_ERROR(drm, "couldn't wake up GPU!\n"); > >> + return -EBUSY; > >> + } > > > > Looks to me like the more idiomatic way to do this is: > > > > ret = pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0); > > if (ret < 0 && ret != -EIO) > > return ret; > > > > I thought so too, but it ends up returning 0 even if setting the power > state fails. Or maybe I did something wrong when installing the > kernel. I could take another shot at it, but what I came up with seems > to work. Adding airlied in CC, because he saw my patch and didn't > complain about it. Hopefully he knows more. pci_raw_set_power_state(), called by pci_set_power_state(), contains this, which looks to me like it would be the only case where the problem you're describing could be coming from: dev->current_state = (pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK); if (dev->current_state != state && printk_ratelimit()) dev_info(&dev->dev, "Refused to change power state, currently in D%d\n", dev->current_state); Do you happen to see this in the kernel logs? Perhaps this should be considered an error rather than just an KERN_INFO level message? Adding Bjorn and linux-pci for visibility. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature