On 02/11/17 02:53 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
It would have made sense if that function would be used also within the file where it was declared but it is not the case. So you see the questionable way the READ_ONCE got in there and now you may understand that I did not see much of big loss if it wasn't there after the rewrite/change.
Yes, but I feel like it still makes sense for it to be there (per the article I linked), despite the incorrect justification.
Logan