> This is fine by me Thanks for another bit of change acceptance. > except that the change in the name of the goto label seems spurious. I am curious if the popularity of a jump label like “err” will decrease (in the Linux source files) over time. > But if you really want to change it then as it is an error path > I should suggest it describe that its an error and what unwinding > is done, f.e. err_remove_domain. * Do you get such a kind of information only when the prefix “err_” is added to this identifier? * Do you prefer to stress the “domain removal” (or the shown error message) in the label? Regards, Markus
