On Monday, October 16, 2017 8:28:52 AM CEST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:29:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > struct dev_pm_info {
> > pm_message_t power_state;
> > unsigned int can_wakeup:1;
> > @@ -561,6 +580,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
> > bool is_late_suspended:1;
> > bool early_init:1; /* Owned by the PM core */
> > bool direct_complete:1; /* Owned by the PM core */
> > + unsigned int driver_flags;
>
> Minor nit, u32 or u64?
u32 I think, will update.
BTW, there's a mess in this struct overall and I'd like all of the bit fileds
to be the same type (and that shouldn't be bool IMO :-)).
Do you prefer u32 or unsinged int?
Thanks,
Rafael
