Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: roopa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, steven.lin1@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxx, michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gospo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20171012150419.GI14672@nanopsycho>

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:04:19 +0200

> Not sure we want to go this way and add "netdev"-handle things into
> devlink. Thoughts?

I think we should avoid this and keep devlink to it's designed purpose.

References:
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink
  - From: Jiri Pirko
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink
  - From: Roopa Prabhu
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink
  - From: Jiri Pirko

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink
Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/3] Adding config get/set to devlink
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DMA Engine] [Linux Coverity] [Linux USB] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Greybus]

Powered by Linux