On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 02:29:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If CONFIG_PCI=n, and gcc (e.g. 4.1.2) decides not to inline
> get_pci_function_alias_group(), the build fails with:
>
> drivers/iommu/iommu.o: In function `get_pci_function_alias_group':
> iommu.c:(.text+0xfdc): undefined reference to `pci_acs_enabled'
>
> Due to the various dummies for PCI calls in the CONFIG_PCI=n case,
> pci_acs_enabled() isn't actually ever called, but not all versions of
> gcc are smart enough to realize that.
>
> While explicitly marking get_pci_function_alias_group() inline would fix
> the build, this would inflate the code for the CONFIG_PCI=y case, as
> get_pci_function_alias_group() is a not-so-small function called from
> two places.
>
> Hence fix the issue by introducing a dummy for pci_acs_enabled()
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Joerg, if you pick this up, would you mind capitalizing the subject
line to match the PCI convention, e.g.,
PCI: Add dummy pci_acs_enabled() for CONFIG_PCI=n build
If it's too late for you to pick this up this week, I can include it
next week. I assume this is not related to a specific change, i.e.,
it's not a regression? Should it be marked for stable?
> ---
> include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index f68c58a93dd045b9..f4f8ee5a7362e982 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1685,6 +1685,8 @@ static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
>
> #define dev_is_pci(d) (false)
> #define dev_is_pf(d) (false)
> +static inline bool pci_acs_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 acs_flags)
> +{ return false; }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
>
> /* Include architecture-dependent settings and functions */
> --
> 2.7.4
>
