On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 13:48 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/15/2017 01:38 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In any case, your patch introduces a regression on systems. Please get
> > > > it reverted now, and then you can come up with a new approach to fix the
> > > > double enable of the upstream bridge.
> > >
> > > Who's sending in the revert? I can certainly do it if no one else does,
> > > but it needs to be done.
> > >
> > > I'm not seeing any patches coming out of Srinath to fix up the
> > > situation, so we should revert the broken patch until a better solution
> > > exists.
> >
> > Hmm. I don't have the history here (apparently it never made lkml, for
> > example), so I don't even know which commit you're talking about.
> >
> > From some of the context it looks like commit 40f11adc7cd9 ("PCI:
> > Avoid race while enabling upstream bridges"), is that correct?
>
> Yes, Luca says that Bjorn already sent in the revert request, I just
> didn't see it since I wasn't CC'ed on it. So looks like we're all
> good, provided that makes it into -rc1. 40f11adc7cd9 is the broken
> commit.
Strange... AFAICT you *were* CCed on it. And so was everyone else in
the original thread (+LKML)...
--
Luca.
