On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:02:21PM +0100, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > Currently if an uncorrectable error is reported by an EP the AER > driver walks over all the devices connected to the upstream port > bus and in turns call the report_error_detected() callback. > If any of the devices connected to the bus does not implement > dev->driver->err_handler->error_detected() do_recovery() will fail > leaving all the bus hierarchy devices unrecovered. > > However for non fatal errors the PCIe link should not be considered > compromised, therefore it makes sense to report the error only to > all the functions that logged an error. Can you include a pointer to the relevant part of the spec here? > This patch implements this new behaviour for non fatal errors. > > Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes from v1: > - now errors are reported only to the fucntions that logged the error > instead of all the functions in the same device. > - the patch subject has changed to match the new implementation > --- > drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c > index b1303b3..057465ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c > @@ -390,7 +390,14 @@ static pci_ers_result_t broadcast_error_message(struct pci_dev *dev, > * If the error is reported by an end point, we think this > * error is related to the upstream link of the end point. > */ > - pci_walk_bus(dev->bus, cb, &result_data); > + if (state == pci_channel_io_normal) > + /* > + * the error is non fatal so the bus is ok, just invoke > + * the callback for the function that logged the error. > + */ > + cb(dev, &result_data); > + else > + pci_walk_bus(dev->bus, cb, &result_data); I think the concept of this change makes sense, but I don't like the implicit connection of PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV -> AER_NONFATAL -> pci_channel_io_normal. That makes it harder than it should be to read the code. What would you think of changing the signature of do_recovery() and broadcast_error_message() so they take the struct aer_err_info pointer instead of just the severity and pci_channel_state? Then we could check directly for AER_NONFATAL here. Bjorn